Reading.CleanArchitecture.Independence

Key Concepts of Chapter 16

1. The Goal of Independence

• Why Independence Matters:
  • Systems that depend heavily on specific frameworks, databases, or tools are hard to change and maintain.
  • Independence allows a system to adapt to new requirements, replace outdated components, or scale effectively.
• Independence leads to:
  • Easier testing.
  • Enhanced reusability of components.
  • Long-term maintainability.

2. Independence from Frameworks

• Frameworks are powerful tools, but they should not dictate the system’s architecture.
• The core business logic should not directly depend on framework-specific classes or features.
• Best Practice:
  • Encapsulate frameworks behind interfaces or adapters.
  • Treat frameworks as plugins rather than foundational elements.

Example:

• Instead of tightly coupling business logic to a web framework like Spring Boot, use controllers or handlers that call the core logic via interfaces.

3. Independence from the Database

• Databases should be treated as details rather than the foundation of a system.
• Core business rules should not rely on database-specific features, queries, or schemas.
• Best Practice:
  • Use repository patterns or gateway interfaces to isolate database interactions.
  • Ensure core logic can be tested without a real database.

4. Independence from the UI

• The user interface is subject to frequent change and should not affect the core business logic.
• Core logic should not depend on UI libraries, components, or frameworks.
• Best Practice:
  • Design UI as a thin layer that interacts with the core logic through controllers or presenters.

5. Independence from External Systems

• External systems, such as third-party APIs, are often unreliable or may change over time.
• Best Practice:
  • Abstract these dependencies using interfaces.
  • Implement the interfaces in the outer layers, keeping the core logic independent.

6. Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP)

• Martin reiterates the importance of the DIP:
  • High-level modules (e.g., core business logic) should not depend on low-level modules (e.g., frameworks, databases).
  • Both should depend on abstractions (interfaces).
• This principle enforces independence by ensuring core logic does not rely on volatile implementation details.

7. Achieving Independence

• Independence requires intentional architectural design:
  • Use interfaces and abstract classes to define contracts between layers.
  • Isolate business rules in a separate layer that does not depend on external systems.
• This design aligns with the onion architecture or hexagonal architecture, where dependencies flow inward toward the core.

8. Trade-offs of Independence

• Achieving independence often requires more upfront effort, such as creating interfaces and writing adapters.
• While this can increase initial development time, it reduces maintenance costs and complexity in the long run.

---

Real-World Example: E-Commerce System

• Core business rules:
  • Handle use cases like adding items to a cart or processing payments.
  • These should not depend on the database schema, web framework, or payment gateway.
• Implementation details:
  • The database, web framework, and payment gateway are encapsulated behind abstractions.
• Benefits:
  • Replace the database (e.g., from SQL to NoSQL) without affecting core business logic.
  • Switch payment gateways (e.g., Stripe to PayPal) by updating only the adapter implementation.

---

Key Takeaways

1. Design for Independence:
   • The system’s core should not depend on volatile implementation details like frameworks, databases, or external systems.
2. Isolate Dependencies:
   • Use abstractions to decouple core logic from lower-level concerns.
3. Follow DIP:
   • Ensure dependencies flow inward, with the core depending only on abstractions.
4. Invest in Independence:
   • While it requires upfront effort, independence makes systems easier to test, maintain, and evolve.