Java.Collections.What happens if you add elements to a TreeSet in ascending order?

🧠 Quick Answer:

If you add elements to a TreeSet in ascending order, it still works perfectly, and the set remains balanced internally, because TreeSet uses a red-black tree, which self-balances on every insertion.

---

📦 Under the hood:

TreeSet is backed by a TreeMap, which is implemented as a red-black tree — a type of self-balancing binary search tree.

That means:

• No matter the insertion order (ascending, descending, random),
• The tree will restructure itself after each insert to maintain O(log n) performance for:
  • add()
  • remove()
  • contains()
  • Iteration (which returns sorted order)

---

💡 So unlike a basic binary search tree (BST), adding elements in sorted order will not degrade it into a “linked list” shape. Instead, the red-black tree keeps it balanced.

---

✅ Example:

Set<Integer> treeSet = new TreeSet<>();
treeSet.add(1);
treeSet.add(2);
treeSet.add(3);
treeSet.add(4);
treeSet.add(5);

System.out.println(treeSet); // [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Even though we added in order:

• Internally: the tree is not skewed,
• Performance: still O(log n) per operation.

---

🔍 Visualization:

If it were a plain BST, inserting [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] would look like this:

1
 \
  2
   \
    3
     \
      4
       \
        5

🔻 Bad: Unbalanced — behaves like a linked list → O(n) lookups

But a red-black tree would rotate nodes as needed, ending up like:

        3
      /   \
     2     5
    /     /
   1     4

🔼 Good: Balanced → O(log n) operations

🧠 TL;DR

Insertion order	Performance	Tree structure
Ascending	✅ O(log n)	✅ Balanced
Descending	✅ O(log n)	✅ Balanced
Random	✅ O(log n)	✅ Balanced

The red-black tree makes sure that even ascending order inserts stay efficient.