Database.Beginner.Why is CHAR Sometimes Faster Than VARCHAR?

It’s mostly about reading speed — but let’s break it down:


Why is CHAR Sometimes Faster Than VARCHAR?

  1. Fixed Size = Simple Calculations
  • CHAR(n) always stores exactly n characters.
  • The database can easily calculate: “Where is the 10th record? Just jump n × 10 bytes.”

Fast offset calculation — no need to scan row lengths.

  1. No Extra Metadata
  • VARCHAR(n) stores variable-length data.
  • It needs extra storage for length information — 1 or 2 bytes per field.
  • Every time you read, the database must: “First check how long the value is, then read it.”

✅ With CHAR, it just reads a fixed block — no lookup needed.

  1. Row Alignment and Memory Access
  • In memory (RAM), fixed-length rows are easier to align and read.
  • CPUs love aligned data — it’s faster to load into cache.

CHAR rows can be packed into aligned memory blocks — speeding up sequential reading.

So in short:

CHAR (Fixed)VARCHAR (Variable)
Fixed size — faster memory accessVariable size — slower memory jumps
No need to check lengthNeed to check length each time
Simple math for row offsetsComplex row parsing
Slightly faster reads in large datasetsSlightly slower reads

Is It Also Faster for Writing?

No — not faster for writing:

  • In fact, CHAR wastes space — even if you only store 2 characters in CHAR(100), it still reserves space for all 100 characters.
  • More disk I/O (because bigger rows).
  • Longer writes for small values.

VARCHAR is better for writing:

  • It stores only the bytes needed.
  • More storage efficient — smaller rows = faster disk writes.

So Final Answer:

OperationWhich is Faster?Why?
Read (Sequential Reads)CHAR (small advantage)Fixed length, faster offsets, no length checking.
Write (Insert/Update)VARCHARSmaller storage, less disk I/O, more efficient space use.

When Does This Matter?

  • In very large tables (millions of rows).
  • In high-performance analytics or data warehouses.
  • When you need extremely predictable row size (like in OLTP banks, telecoms).

Otherwise — for most apps (web, mobile) — VARCHAR is better for storage efficiency and flexibility.

In Short

CHAR can be slightly faster for reading large datasets because of fixed length, but it wastes space and is not faster for writing.

This entry was posted in Без рубрики. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.